§ The result
Beamery leads Cegid by 16 points.
Beamery finishes 16 points clear of Cegid under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 45 (F) — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Cegid takes 2 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 4 for Beamery, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Beamery 85, Cegid 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Cegid
Cegid's HR suite offers two recruiting lines: Cegid HR Talent Acquisition (ex-DigitalRecruiters), an ATS/CRM with CV parsing, scorecards, automated scoring and an AI conversational agent that pre-qualifies candidates on career sites and WhatsApp, and Cegid Talentsoft (now sold as Cegid HR Suite) recruiting, whose 'Recruiting Match' matches positions to candidates algorithmically.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Cegid under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Cegid is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | Cegid |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | FR |
| Founded | 2013 | 1983 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Cegid 30
9.9 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Cegid 50
4.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Cegid 40
2.4 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Cegid 55
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Cegid 32
0.3 weighted points to Cegid
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Cegid 62
0.2 weighted points to Cegid
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +16.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Cegid.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Cegid | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 50 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 30 | +55 | +9.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 32 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 45 (F) | +16 | +16.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Cegid | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 33 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Cegid has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 39 for Cegid, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cegid last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next