Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Beamery vs Criteria
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Concerning
Sourcing
Criteria
Criteria is a pre-employment assessment platform offering scientifically validated cognitive aptitude, personality, emotional-intelligence and skills tests, plus structured and AI-assisted interview tools, used to evaluate and rank job candidates.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Beamery leads Criteria by 8 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Beamery, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 61 (D) and Criteria, filed under Assessment, on 53 (F), 8 points apart. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to Beamery and Criteria, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Beamery holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, Criteria 48 — and at an 18% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Beamery3
- Criteria3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency85 vs 48
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Criteria under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Criteria is in scope of
| Record | Beamery | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2006 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight67% of the movement so far
Beamery85Criteria486.7 weighted points to Beamery
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight89% of the movement so far
Beamery60Criteria422.2 weighted points to Beamery
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight93% of the movement so far
Beamery70Criteria680.4 weighted points to Beamery
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Beamery30Criteria320.3 weighted points to Criteria
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight99% of the movement so far
Beamery60Criteria620.3 weighted points to Criteria
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Beamery55Criteria560.1 weighted points to Criteria
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Criteria, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Criteria | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 68 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 48 | +37 | +6.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 32 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 56 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61D | 53F | +8 | +8.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Criteria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 14 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Criteria has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Criteria, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Criteria last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.