§ The result
Beamery leads DevSkiller on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Beamery finishes 22 points clear of DevSkiller under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 39 (F) — across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Beamery leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so DevSkiller is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Beamery leads is Customer Documentation, Beamery 60 to DevSkiller 58. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, DevSkiller 22 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, DevSkiller under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | DevSkiller |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | PL |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · DevSkiller 22
11.3 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · DevSkiller 35
7.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · DevSkiller 40
2.4 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · DevSkiller 52
1.2 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · DevSkiller 25
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · DevSkiller 58
0.2 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +22.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +22.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus DevSkiller.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | DevSkiller | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 35 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 22 | +63 | +11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 39 (F) | +22 | +22.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | DevSkiller | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 26 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next