§ The result
Beamery takes the total, iMocha takes more of the criteria.
Beamery scores 61 (D) and iMocha 56 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. iMocha leads more of the criteria than Beamery — 4 to 3 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Beamery leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Beamery. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, iMocha 44 — and at an 18% weight it carries 80% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only iMocha is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | IN |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · iMocha 44
7.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · iMocha 48
1.4 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · iMocha 38
1.2 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · iMocha 64
1.1 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · iMocha 66
0.9 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · iMocha 66
0.5 weighted points to iMocha
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · iMocha 68
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 68 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 44 | +41 | +7.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 56 (F) | +5 | +5.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next