§ The result
Beamery leads Infor Talent Science by 12 points.
Beamery sits 12 points above Infor Talent Science under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 49 (F) — with Beamery filed under Sourcing and Infor Talent Science under Assessment. Beamery leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Infor Talent Science leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Beamery 85, Infor Talent Science 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 60% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Infor Talent Science
Infor Talent Science is a cloud-based pre-hire behavioral and cognitive assessment platform. It scores candidates against patented machine-learning 'Performance Profiles' built from the behavior and performance data of an employer's successful incumbents, and gives hiring teams fit scores, recommendations and interview questions that are used to rank and route applicants.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Infor Talent Science under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Infor Talent Science is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | Infor Talent Science |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Infor Talent Science 42
7.7 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Infor Talent Science 58
2.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Infor Talent Science 45
1.8 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Infor Talent Science 35
0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Infor Talent Science 50
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Infor Talent Science 57
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +12.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Infor Talent Science.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Infor Talent Science | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 58 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 42 | +43 | +7.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 57 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 49 (F) | +12 | +12.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Infor Talent Science | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Infor Talent Science last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next