§ The result
Beamery leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Beamery (Sourcing) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated) are 32 points apart under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) for Beamery against 29 (F) for JobDiva. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Beamery is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage Beamery holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Beamery 85, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 39% of the weighted points Beamery gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.
| Record | Beamery | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · JobDiva 15
12.6 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · JobDiva 28
8.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · JobDiva 30
3.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · JobDiva 38
3.3 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · JobDiva 42
1.4 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · JobDiva 22
1.2 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +32.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 32.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +32 beside that +32.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 28 | +42 | +8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 15 | +70 | +12.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 29 (F) | +32 | +32.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next