§ The result
Maki People takes the total, Beamery takes more of the criteria.
Maki People (Assessment) edges Beamery (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 62 to 61. Beamery leads more of the criteria than Maki People — 4 to 3 — but FRIA Support, which Maki People leads, carries 15% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Maki People. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 30, Maki People 57 — and at a 15% weight it carries 79% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Maki People is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | FR |
| Founded | 2013 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 44% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Maki People 57
4.0 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Maki People 62
1.6 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Maki People 52
1.0 weighted points to Beamery
18% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Maki People 80
0.9 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Maki People 70
0.8 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Maki People 50
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Maki People 62
0.3 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 62 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 80 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 57 | -27 | -4.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 70 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 62 (D) | -1 | -1.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Maki People has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for Maki People, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next