§ The result
Beamery leads micro1 on all 7 criteria.
Beamery (Sourcing) and micro1 (Screening) are 25 points apart under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) for Beamery against 36 (F) for micro1. micro1 leads none of the 7 criteria, and Beamery is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, micro1 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
micro1
Zara, micro1's LLM-based AI interviewer, runs recorded, adaptive spoken interviews (with optional coding exercises and automated proctoring) and returns per-skill proficiency ratings, soft-skill ratings and a proctoring score; micro1 uses it to certify experts for its own AI-training talent network, and employers can use it through a client portal and API.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, micro1 under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only micro1 is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | micro1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · micro1 20
11.7 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · micro1 25
4.2 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · micro1 50
4.0 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · micro1 45
2.3 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · micro1 22
1.2 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · micro1 45
1.2 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · micro1 48
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +25.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +25.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus micro1.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | micro1 | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 50 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 20 | +65 | +11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 25 | +35 | +4.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 36 (F) | +25 | +25.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | micro1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and micro1 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- micro1 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next