§ The result
3 points separate PageUp and Beamery.
PageUp (ATS-integrated) edges Beamery (Sourcing) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 64 to 61. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of PageUp: PageUp is ahead on FRIA Support and Beamery on Bias Audit Transparency. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Beamery 30, PageUp 40, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only PageUp is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | AU |
| Founded | 2013 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 27% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · PageUp 40
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · PageUp 64
1.1 weighted points to PageUp
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · PageUp 80
0.9 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · PageUp 74
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · PageUp 55
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · PageUp 63
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · PageUp 63
0.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 74 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 80 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 64 (D) | -3 | -2.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next