§ The result
Beamery leads Plum by 7 points.
Beamery scores 61 (D) and Plum 54 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Beamery leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Plum leads 1, including Customer Documentation. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 60, Plum 36 — and at a 12% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Plum under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Plum is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | Plum |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | CA |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Plum 36
2.9 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Plum 58
2.4 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Plum 54
0.9 weighted points to Beamery
18% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Plum 83
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Plum 52
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Plum 28
0.3 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Plum 63
0.2 weighted points to Plum
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Plum | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 58 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 83 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 36 | +24 | +2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 54 (F) | +7 | +7.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Plum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 15 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Plum has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Plum, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Plum last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next