§ The result
Beamery leads The Predictive Index by 13 points.
Beamery sits 13 points above The Predictive Index under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 48 (F) — with Beamery filed under Sourcing and The Predictive Index under Assessment. Beamery leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while The Predictive Index leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, The Predictive Index 45 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only The Predictive Index is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | The Predictive Index |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 1955 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · The Predictive Index 45
7.2 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · The Predictive Index 50
4.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · The Predictive Index 43
2.0 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · The Predictive Index 35
0.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · The Predictive Index 55
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · The Predictive Index 52
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +13.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus The Predictive Index.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | The Predictive Index | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 50 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 45 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 43 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 48 (F) | +13 | +13.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | The Predictive Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next