§ The result
Beamery leads Pymetrics (Harver Games) on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Beamery scores 61 (D) and Pymetrics (Harver Games) 56 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Beamery leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Pymetrics (Harver Games) is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Beamery leads is Bias Audit Transparency, Beamery 85 to Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 60, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 — and at a 12% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
3.0 weighted points to Beamery
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80
0.9 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50
0.6 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +5.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 70 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 80 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 56 (F) | +5 | +5.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 22 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next