§ The result
Beamery leads Test Partnership by 11 points.
Beamery, filed under Sourcing, comes out 11 points above Test Partnership, filed under Assessment: 61 (D) against 50 (F) under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Beamery: Beamery is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Test Partnership on FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, Test Partnership 48 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Test Partnership
Test Partnership publishes computer-adaptive aptitude tests, the TPAQ personality questionnaire and MindmetriQ game-based cognitive assessments. Employers review, rank and export the resulting norm-referenced percentile and sten scores in its dashboard, through its API or in integrated ATSs.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Test Partnership under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Test Partnership is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | Test Partnership |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | GB |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Test Partnership 48
6.7 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Test Partnership 33
3.2 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Test Partnership 57
2.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Test Partnership 36
0.9 weighted points to Test Partnership
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Test Partnership 57
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Test Partnership 58
0.4 weighted points to Test Partnership
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Test Partnership 62
0.2 weighted points to Test Partnership
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Test Partnership.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Test Partnership | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 57 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 48 | +37 | +6.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 57 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 33 | +27 | +3.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 50 (F) | +11 | +11.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Test Partnership | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Test Partnership has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Test Partnership sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Test Partnership, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Test Partnership last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next