§ The result
Beamery leads Xobin by 11 points.
Beamery sits 11 points above Xobin under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 50 (F) — with Beamery filed under Sourcing and Xobin under Assessment. Xobin takes 2 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 4 for Beamery, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Beamery 85, Xobin 43) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 62% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Xobin
Xobin is a talent-assessment platform that sells skills, coding, communication and psychometric tests alongside generative-AI answer scoring (AI Evaluate), AI-led interviews, AI proctoring and NURA, an AI recruiting agent that parses resumes, interviews candidates and builds shortlists.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Xobin under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Xobin is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | Xobin |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | IN |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Xobin 43
7.6 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Xobin 38
2.6 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Xobin 62
1.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Xobin 35
0.8 weighted points to Xobin
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Xobin 57
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Xobin 58
0.4 weighted points to Xobin
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Xobin.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Xobin | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 62 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 43 | +42 | +7.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 57 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 50 (F) | +11 | +11.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Xobin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Xobin has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Xobin sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Xobin, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Xobin last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next