HomeCompareBryq vs Entelo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bryq vs Entelo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Bryq leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.

Bryq finishes 24 points clear of Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 33 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Bryq leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Entelo leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Bryq 70, Entelo 20, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Entelo under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Bryq is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBryqEntelo
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bryq 70 · Entelo 20

    9.0 weighted points to Bryq

  2. 20% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bryq 54 · Entelo 30

    4.8 weighted points to Bryq

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bryq 62 · Entelo 45

    2.5 weighted points to Bryq

  4. 12% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bryq 55 · Entelo 35

    2.4 weighted points to Bryq

  5. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bryq 40 · Entelo 25

    2.3 weighted points to Bryq

  6. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bryq 66 · Entelo 40

    2.1 weighted points to Bryq

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bryq 54 · Entelo 42

    1.4 weighted points to Bryq

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +24.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +24.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bryq minus Entelo.

CategoryWeightBryqEnteloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5430+24+4.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%7020+50+9.0
FRIA Support15%4025+15+2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6245+17+2.5
Human Oversight Design12%5442+12+1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%5535+20+2.4
Customer Documentation8%6640+26+2.1
Total100%57 (F)33 (F)+24+24.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBryqEntelo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain22
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%204Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain98Sources on the vendor's own domain

Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bryq last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.