§ The result
Bryq leads Intervue.io on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Bryq (Assessment) and Intervue.io (Video interview) are 26 points apart under rubric v1.0, 57 for Bryq against 31 for Intervue.io. Intervue.io is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Bryq takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Customer Documentation, Bryq 66 to Intervue.io 50. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Bryq 70, Intervue.io 12 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Bryq | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Bryq 70 · Intervue.io 12
10.4 weighted points to Bryq
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Bryq 54 · Intervue.io 28
5.2 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Bryq 62 · Intervue.io 38
3.6 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Bryq 55 · Intervue.io 30
3.0 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Bryq 40 · Intervue.io 22
2.7 weighted points to Bryq
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Bryq 66 · Intervue.io 50
1.3 weighted points to Bryq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +26.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +26 beside that +26.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bryq minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Bryq | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 54 | 28 | +26 | +5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 70 | 12 | +58 | +10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 22 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 38 | +24 | +3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 54 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 30 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 31 (F) | +26 | +26.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bryq | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next