HomeCompareBryq vs RecruitBot

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bryq vs RecruitBot

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Bryq leads RecruitBot on all 7 criteria.

Bryq finishes 20 points clear of RecruitBot under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 37 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Bryq takes all 7 criteria and RecruitBot none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Bryq 54 to RecruitBot 50. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Bryq 70, RecruitBot 22) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, RecruitBot under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Bryq is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBryqRecruitBot
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bryq 70 · RecruitBot 22

    8.6 weighted points to Bryq

  2. 20% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bryq 54 · RecruitBot 33

    4.2 weighted points to Bryq

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bryq 62 · RecruitBot 48

    2.1 weighted points to Bryq

  4. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bryq 40 · RecruitBot 27

    1.9 weighted points to Bryq

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bryq 55 · RecruitBot 40

    1.8 weighted points to Bryq

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bryq 66 · RecruitBot 55

    0.9 weighted points to Bryq

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bryq 54 · RecruitBot 50

    0.5 weighted points to Bryq

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +20.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bryq minus RecruitBot.

CategoryWeightBryqRecruitBotΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5433+21+4.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%7022+48+8.6
FRIA Support15%4027+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6248+14+2.1
Human Oversight Design12%5450+4+0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%5540+15+1.8
Customer Documentation8%6655+11+0.9
Total100%57 (F)37 (F)+20+20.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBryqRecruitBot
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%204Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain256Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; RecruitBot has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq and RecruitBot sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 31 for RecruitBot, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bryq last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
RecruitBot last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.