HomeCompareBryq vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bryq vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Bryq leads Talview by 15 points.

Bryq finishes 15 points clear of Talview under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 42 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Bryq leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Talview leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Bryq 70, Talview 38, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBryqTalview
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 39% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bryq 70 · Talview 38

    5.8 weighted points to Bryq

  2. 12% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bryq 55 · Talview 32

    2.8 weighted points to Bryq

  3. 15% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bryq 40 · Talview 25

    2.3 weighted points to Bryq

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bryq 62 · Talview 48

    2.1 weighted points to Bryq

  5. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bryq 66 · Talview 52

    1.1 weighted points to Bryq

  6. 20% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bryq 54 · Talview 50

    0.8 weighted points to Bryq

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bryq 54 · Talview 55

    0.1 weighted points to Talview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +14.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +14.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bryq minus Talview.

CategoryWeightBryqTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5450+4+0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%7038+32+5.8
FRIA Support15%4025+15+2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6248+14+2.1
Human Oversight Design12%5455-1-0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%5532+23+2.8
Customer Documentation8%6652+14+1.1
Total100%57 (F)42 (F)+15+14.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBryqTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%204Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Bryq last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.