§ The result
Cappfinity takes the total, Canditech takes more of the criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Cappfinity and Canditech finish 1 point apart, 40 to 39, as two Assessment entries. Canditech leads more of the criteria, 4 against 2 for Cappfinity, yet Cappfinity takes Post-Market Monitoring, which carries 12% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Canditech 32, Cappfinity 38 — and at a 12% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage Cappfinity holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Canditech
Canditech is a skills-assessment and job-simulation platform that screens candidates with work-sample tests, technical and soft-skill assessments, and one-way video interviews, using AI agents to auto-score open-text and video responses.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
§ The record
Canditech and Cappfinity are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Canditech | Cappfinity |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IL | GB |
| Founded | 2019 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Canditech 32 · Cappfinity 38
0.7 weighted points to Cappfinity
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Canditech 25 · Cappfinity 28
0.5 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Canditech 30 · Cappfinity 28
0.3 weighted points to Canditech
20% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Canditech 37 · Cappfinity 36
0.2 weighted points to Canditech
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Canditech 58 · Cappfinity 56
0.2 weighted points to Canditech
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Canditech 53 · Cappfinity 52
0.1 weighted points to Canditech
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Canditech minus Cappfinity.
| Category | Weight | Canditech | Cappfinity | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 37 | 36 | +1 | +0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 53 | 52 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 38 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 56 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 40 (F) | -1 | -0.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Canditech | Cappfinity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Canditech last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next