§ The result
Codility leads Canditech on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 15 points clear of Canditech inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 54 against 39. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria, Canditech none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Canditech 52 to Codility 57. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Canditech 37, Codility 60, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Canditech
Canditech is a skills-assessment and job-simulation platform that screens candidates with work-sample tests, technical and soft-skill assessments, and one-way video interviews, using AI agents to auto-score open-text and video responses.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
§ The record
Canditech and Codility are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Canditech | Codility |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | IL | GB |
| Founded | 2019 | 2009 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Canditech 37 · Codility 60
4.6 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Canditech 25 · Codility 45
3.6 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Canditech 32 · Codility 50
2.2 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Canditech 30 · Codility 42
1.8 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Canditech 53 · Codility 62
1.1 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Canditech 52 · Codility 57
0.8 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Canditech 58 · Codility 66
0.6 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Canditech minus Codility.
| Category | Weight | Canditech | Codility | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 37 | 60 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 45 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 57 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 53 | 62 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 50 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 54 (F) | -15 | -14.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Canditech | Codility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Canditech last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next