§ The result
HeyMilo leads Canditech on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo finishes 22 points clear of Canditech under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 39 (F) — across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, Canditech none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Canditech 58 to HeyMilo 66. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Canditech 25, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 48% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Canditech
Canditech is a skills-assessment and job-simulation platform that screens candidates with work-sample tests, technical and soft-skill assessments, and one-way video interviews, using AI agents to auto-score open-text and video responses.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Canditech is filed under Assessment AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Canditech | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IL | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Canditech 25 · HeyMilo 83
10.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Canditech 37 · HeyMilo 58
4.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Canditech 30 · HeyMilo 42
1.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Canditech 32 · HeyMilo 46
1.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Canditech 52 · HeyMilo 62
1.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Canditech 53 · HeyMilo 64
1.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Canditech 58 · HeyMilo 66
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Canditech minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Canditech | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 37 | 58 | -21 | -4.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 83 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 53 | 64 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 46 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 61 (D) | -22 | -21.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Canditech | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Canditech last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next