HomeCompareCanditech vs HireQuotient

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Canditech vs HireQuotient

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Canditech leads HireQuotient by 5 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Canditech, filed under Assessment, finishes on 39 and HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing, on 34, 5 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Canditech: Canditech is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and HireQuotient on Human Oversight Design. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Canditech 52, HireQuotient 40, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage Canditech holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Canditech is filed under Assessment AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Video interview.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCanditechHireQuotient
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersILSG
Founded20192021

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Canditech 52 · HireQuotient 40

    1.8 weighted points to Canditech

  2. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Canditech 25 · HireQuotient 18

    1.3 weighted points to Canditech

  3. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Canditech 30 · HireQuotient 22

    1.2 weighted points to Canditech

  4. 8% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Canditech 58 · HireQuotient 50

    0.6 weighted points to Canditech

  5. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Canditech 53 · HireQuotient 57

    0.5 weighted points to HireQuotient

  6. 20% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Canditech 37 · HireQuotient 35

    0.4 weighted points to Canditech

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Canditech 32 · HireQuotient 30

    0.2 weighted points to Canditech

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Canditech minus HireQuotient.

CategoryWeightCanditechHireQuotientΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3735+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2518+7+1.3
FRIA Support15%3022+8+1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5240+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5357-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3230+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%5850+8+0.6
Total100%39 (F)34 (F)+5+5.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCanditechHireQuotient
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%117Sources on the vendor's own domain245Sources on the vendor's own domain

Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Canditech last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.