§ The result
3 points separate Cappfinity and Fetcher.
Cappfinity holds a 3-point edge over Fetcher under rubric v1.0, 40 to 37, across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Cappfinity leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Fetcher leads 1, including Data Governance Disclosure, and 2 are level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cappfinity 36, Fetcher 27 — and at a 20% weight it carries 67% of the weighted advantage Cappfinity holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Vendor profile
Fetcher
AI-powered candidate sourcing and outbound recruiting platform that automates passive and active talent sourcing, personalized email outreach, and inbound applicant screening for corporate recruiting teams.
§ The record
Cappfinity is filed under Assessment AI, Fetcher under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Cappfinity is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cappfinity | Fetcher |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2005 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cappfinity 36 · Fetcher 27
1.8 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cappfinity 28 · Fetcher 25
0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cappfinity 52 · Fetcher 55
0.4 weighted points to Fetcher
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cappfinity 38 · Fetcher 35
0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cappfinity 56 · Fetcher 55
0.1 weighted points to Cappfinity
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +2.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Fetcher.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Fetcher | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 27 | +9 | +1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 37 (F) | +3 | +2.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Fetcher | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Fetcher has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 19 for Fetcher, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Fetcher last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next