Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment vs Oleeo
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Oleeo
Oleeo is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition platform that uses machine learning to score, rank, and screen candidates from resumes, applications, and assessment responses, with prescriptive interview and hire recommendations and a stated diversity/bias-mitigation focus.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
1 point separates Cezanne Recruitment and Oleeo.
Within the ATS-integrated cohort, Cezanne Recruitment edges Oleeo by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 41 to 40. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Cezanne Recruitment, with 1 level: Cezanne Recruitment is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Oleeo on Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, and Oleeo holds it (Cezanne Recruitment 24, Oleeo 40, 18% weight), worth 100% of the weighted advantage Oleeo builds across the 1 criterion it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Cezanne Recruitment5
- Oleeo1
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency24 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Cezanne Recruitment and Oleeo are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Oleeo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 1995 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight42% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment24Oleeo402.9 weighted points to Oleeo
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight66% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment44Oleeo301.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight86% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment54Oleeo451.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment28Oleeo250.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment58Oleeo550.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment57Oleeo550.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Oleeo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Oleeo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 40 | -16 | -2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 45 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 40F | +1 | +1.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Oleeo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Oleeo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Oleeo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Oleeo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.