The result

1 point separates Cezanne Recruitment and Paycor.

Within the ATS-integrated cohort, Cezanne Recruitment edges Paycor by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 41 to 40. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Cezanne Recruitment, with 1 level: Cezanne Recruitment is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Paycor on Bias Audit Transparency. The advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds is spread out: Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cezanne Recruitment 44, Paycor 38, 12% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points Cezanne Recruitment gains across the 5 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Cezanne Recruitment5
  • Paycor1
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Post-Market Monitoring44 vs 38
Heaviest weighted swing
Post-Market Monitoring12% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Cezanne Recruitment and Paycor are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentPaycor
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20121990

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight33% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment44
    Paycor38

    0.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  2. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight61% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment54
    Paycor50

    0.6 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight77% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment58
    Paycor55

    0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  4. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight86% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment24
    Paycor25

    0.2 weighted points to Paycor

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight93% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment57
    Paycor55

    0.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  6. FRIA Support

    15% weight100% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment28
    Paycor27

    0.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.8.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Paycor, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentPaycorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4040--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2425-1-0.2
FRIA Support15%2827+1+0.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5450+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4438+6+0.7
Customer Documentation8%5755+2+0.2
Total100%41F40F+1+1.8

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentPaycor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycor last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next