Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment vs Recruit CRM
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
1 point separates Cezanne Recruitment and Recruit CRM.
Cezanne Recruitment holds a 1-point edge over Recruit CRM under rubric v1.0, 41 to 40, with both scored in the ATS-integrated cohort. Recruit CRM takes 2 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 3 for Cezanne Recruitment, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 2 are level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cezanne Recruitment 40, Recruit CRM 34 — and at a 20% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Cezanne Recruitment3
- Recruit CRM2
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation40 vs 34
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Cezanne Recruitment and Recruit CRM are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Cezanne Recruitment is in scope of
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Recruit CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | Not recorded |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight36% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment40Recruit CRM341.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight64% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment28Recruit CRM340.9 weighted points to Recruit CRM
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight85% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment24Recruit CRM200.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight93% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment44Recruit CRM420.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment57Recruit CRM600.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Recruit CRM, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Recruit CRM | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 34 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 20 | +4 | +0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 34 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 54 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 42 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 40F | +1 | +1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Recruit CRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.