HomeCompareClevry vs Covey

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Clevry vs Covey

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Covey takes the total, Clevry takes more of the criteria.

Covey (Sourcing) edges Clevry (Assessment) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 47 to 45. Clevry leads more of the criteria than Covey — 5 to 1 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Covey leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Covey. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Clevry 38, Covey 72) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 100% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 1 criterion it leads.

§ The record

Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, Covey under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClevryCovey
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded19912018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Clevry 38 · Covey 72

    6.1 weighted points to Covey

  2. 20% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Clevry 52 · Covey 40

    2.4 weighted points to Clevry

  3. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Clevry 30 · Covey 25

    0.8 weighted points to Clevry

  4. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Clevry 58 · Covey 52

    0.7 weighted points to Clevry

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Clevry 55 · Covey 52

    0.4 weighted points to Clevry

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Clevry 60 · Covey 58

    0.2 weighted points to Clevry

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Clevry minus Covey.

CategoryWeightClevryCoveyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5240+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3872-34-6.1
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5552+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5852+6+0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3030--
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%45 (F)47 (F)-2-1.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClevryCovey
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%71Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%395Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry and Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Clevry last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.