HomeCompareClevry vs Keka

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Clevry vs Keka

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Clevry leads Keka by 8 points.

Clevry scores 45 and Keka 37 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Clevry, with 1 level: Clevry is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Keka on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Clevry 52, Keka 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage Clevry holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, Keka under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClevryKeka
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersGBIN
Founded19912014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Clevry 52 · Keka 30

    4.4 weighted points to Clevry

  2. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Clevry 38 · Keka 20

    3.2 weighted points to Clevry

  3. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Clevry 30 · Keka 40

    1.2 weighted points to Keka

  4. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Clevry 58 · Keka 50

    1.0 weighted points to Clevry

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Clevry 55 · Keka 50

    0.8 weighted points to Clevry

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Clevry 60 · Keka 55

    0.4 weighted points to Clevry

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Clevry minus Keka.

CategoryWeightClevryKekaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5230+22+4.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3820+18+3.2
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5550+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5850+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6055+5+0.4
Total100%45 (F)37 (F)+8+8.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClevryKeka
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%71Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%395Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain287Sources on the vendor's own domain

Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 79 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Clevry last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.