HomeCompareClevry vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Clevry vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Clevry on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter sits 12 points above Clevry under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 45 — with LinkedIn Recruiter filed under Sourcing and Clevry under Assessment. LinkedIn Recruiter leads every one of the 7 criteria, Clevry none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Clevry 55 to LinkedIn Recruiter 62. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (Clevry 30, LinkedIn Recruiter 50) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Clevry 52, LinkedIn Recruiter 67), 26% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClevryLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded19912002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Clevry 52 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    3.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 12% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Clevry 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 18% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Clevry 38 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    2.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Clevry 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Clevry 55 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    1.1 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Clevry 58 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Clevry 60 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Clevry minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightClevryLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5267-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3850-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3038-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5562-7-1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5866-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3050-20-2.4
Customer Documentation8%6068-8-0.6
Total100%45 (F)57 (F)-12-11.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClevryLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%71Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%395Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 83 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Clevry last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.