§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Clevry on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Workday Recruiting AI, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 11 points above Clevry, filed under Assessment: 56 against 45 under rubric v1.0. Clevry is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Workday Recruiting AI takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is FRIA Support, Clevry 30 to Workday Recruiting AI 35. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Clevry 38, Workday Recruiting AI 60, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Clevry
Clevry is a UK psychometric assessment platform offering norm-referenced personality questionnaires, cognitive ability tests and situational judgement tests, plus recorded one-way video interviews, an interview builder, a skills-first ATS and an AI tool that maps job ads onto its personality scale library.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Clevry | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 1991 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Clevry 38 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
4.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Clevry 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
3.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Clevry 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Clevry 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Clevry 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Clevry 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -10.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Clevry minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Clevry | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 70 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 56 (F) | -11 | -10.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Clevry | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 39 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Clevry last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next