§ The result
Coderbyte leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Coderbyte, filed under Assessment, comes out 13 points above JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated: 42 against 29 under rubric v1.0. Coderbyte takes all 7 criteria and JobDiva none of them; the nearest contest is Bias Audit Transparency, Coderbyte 20 to JobDiva 15. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Coderbyte 60, JobDiva 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Coderbyte 44, JobDiva 28), the second being 24% of the weighted advantage Coderbyte holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Coderbyte is filed under Assessment AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Coderbyte is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Coderbyte | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Coderbyte 44 · JobDiva 28
3.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Coderbyte 56 · JobDiva 38
2.7 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Coderbyte 60 · JobDiva 40
2.4 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Coderbyte 33 · JobDiva 22
1.6 weighted points to Coderbyte
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Coderbyte 58 · JobDiva 42
1.3 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Coderbyte 40 · JobDiva 30
1.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Coderbyte 20 · JobDiva 15
0.9 weighted points to Coderbyte
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 28 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 15 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 22 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 38 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 29 (F) | +13 | +13.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next