§ The result
PageUp leads Coderbyte on all 7 criteria.
PageUp finishes 22 points clear of Coderbyte under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 42 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria, Coderbyte none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Coderbyte 60 to PageUp 64. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Coderbyte 20, PageUp 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 50% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Coderbyte is filed under Assessment AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Coderbyte is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Coderbyte | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Coderbyte 20 · PageUp 80
10.8 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Coderbyte 44 · PageUp 74
6.0 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Coderbyte 40 · PageUp 55
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Coderbyte 33 · PageUp 40
1.1 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Coderbyte 56 · PageUp 63
1.1 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Coderbyte 60 · PageUp 64
0.5 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Coderbyte 58 · PageUp 63
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 74 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 80 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 63 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 63 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 64 (D) | -22 | -21.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next