§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Coderbyte by 14 points.
Workday Recruiting AI, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 14 points above Coderbyte, filed under Assessment: 56 against 42 under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Workday Recruiting AI: Workday Recruiting AI is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Coderbyte on Post-Market Monitoring. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Coderbyte 20, Workday Recruiting AI 60 — and at an 18% weight it carries 52% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Coderbyte is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Coderbyte is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Coderbyte | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Coderbyte 20 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
7.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Coderbyte 44 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
5.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Coderbyte 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Coderbyte 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Coderbyte
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Coderbyte 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Coderbyte 33 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Coderbyte 56 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.1 weighted points to Coderbyte
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 70 | -26 | -5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 60 | -40 | -7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 56 (F) | -14 | -13.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next