Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
CodeSignal vs Equalture
CodeSignal
CodeSignal is a technical skills assessment and interview platform for developer hiring that adds AI features including an AI Interviewer, AI-assisted/agentic coding assessments, and AI-plus-human proctoring.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Equalture and CodeSignal.
Equalture holds a 1-point edge over CodeSignal under rubric v1.0, 44 to 43, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. CodeSignal and Equalture each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Equalture holds (headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (CodeSignal 38, Equalture 45) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Equalture holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- CodeSignal3
- Equalture3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation38 vs 45
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
CodeSignal and Equalture are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | CodeSignal | Equalture |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight31% of the movement so far
CodeSignal38Equalture451.4 weighted points to Equalture
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight50% of the movement so far
CodeSignal45Equalture400.9 weighted points to CodeSignal
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight67% of the movement so far
CodeSignal25Equalture300.8 weighted points to Equalture
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight83% of the movement so far
CodeSignal50Equalture550.8 weighted points to Equalture
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
CodeSignal55Equalture500.6 weighted points to CodeSignal
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
CodeSignal62Equalture600.2 weighted points to CodeSignal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is CodeSignal minus Equalture, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | CodeSignal | Equalture | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 45 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 43F | 44F | -1 | -1.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | CodeSignal | Equalture | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
CodeSignal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for CodeSignal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- CodeSignal last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.