§ The result
Codility leads Dice on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Codility (Assessment) opens an 18-point lead on Dice (Sourcing), 54 to 36. Of the 7 criteria Dice wins none, and the narrowest lead Codility holds is on Human Oversight Design, Codility 62 to Dice 55. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Codility 60, Dice 32, 20% weight), is only 32% of the weighted advantage Codility builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
Dice
Dice is a US job marketplace and resume database for tech roles, run by DHI Group, whose employer tools use a proprietary skills knowledge graph and machine learning (IntelliSearch) to match, score and rank sourced candidates and applicants against job postings.
§ The record
Codility is filed under Assessment AI, Dice under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Codility is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | Dice |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2009 | 1990 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · Dice 32
5.6 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · Dice 25
3.6 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · Dice 25
2.5 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · Dice 45
1.8 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · Dice 35
1.8 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · Dice 50
1.3 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · Dice 55
0.8 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus Dice.
| Category | Weight | Codility | Dice | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 32 | +28 | +5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 25 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 35 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 36 (F) | +18 | +17.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | Dice | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Dice last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next