§ The result
Codility leads Recruit CRM on all 7 criteria.
Codility, filed under Assessment, comes out 14 points above Recruit CRM, filed under ATS-integrated: 54 against 40 under rubric v1.0. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria, Recruit CRM none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Codility 57 to Recruit CRM 54. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Codility 60, Recruit CRM 34, 20% weight), is only 39% of the weighted advantage Codility builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
§ The record
Codility is filed under Assessment AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Codility is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | Recruit CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2009 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · Recruit CRM 34
5.2 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · Recruit CRM 20
4.5 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · Recruit CRM 34
1.2 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · Recruit CRM 42
1.0 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · Recruit CRM 58
0.5 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · Recruit CRM 60
0.5 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · Recruit CRM 54
0.4 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +13.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus Recruit CRM.
| Category | Weight | Codility | Recruit CRM | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 34 | +26 | +5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 20 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 34 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 54 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 60 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 40 (F) | +14 | +13.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | Recruit CRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next