§ The result
Greenhouse leads Cornerstone OnDemand on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse sits 11 points above Cornerstone OnDemand under rubric v1.0, 67 (D) against 56 (F), with both filed under ATS-integrated. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria, Cornerstone OnDemand none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Cornerstone OnDemand 60 to Greenhouse 64. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cornerstone OnDemand 58, Greenhouse 86 — and at an 18% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cornerstone OnDemand
Cornerstone OnDemand is an enterprise talent-management and learning suite whose Cornerstone Galaxy platform uses AI-driven skills extraction and matching (including the acquired SkyHive Skills Models) to power recruiting, candidate screening, and workforce development.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Cornerstone OnDemand and Greenhouse are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Cornerstone OnDemand is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cornerstone OnDemand | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1999 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · Greenhouse 86
5.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · Greenhouse 58
1.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cornerstone OnDemand 55 · Greenhouse 66
1.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · Greenhouse 78
1.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cornerstone OnDemand 35 · Greenhouse 42
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Greenhouse 64
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Greenhouse 64
0.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Cornerstone OnDemand | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 72 | 78 | -6 | -1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 58 | 86 | -28 | -5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 67 (D) | -11 | -11.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cornerstone OnDemand | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next