HomeCompareCornerstone OnDemand vs myInterview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cornerstone OnDemand vs myInterview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Cornerstone OnDemand leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.

Cornerstone OnDemand finishes 19 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 37 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Cornerstone OnDemand leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; myInterview leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Cornerstone OnDemand 72, myInterview 38, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cornerstone OnDemand is filed under ATS-integrated AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCornerstone OnDemandmyInterview
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded19992014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · myInterview 38

    6.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · myInterview 35

    4.1 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 15% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · myInterview 42

    2.7 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  4. 8% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · myInterview 40

    1.6 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  5. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cornerstone OnDemand 35 · myInterview 25

    1.5 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · myInterview 33

    1.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cornerstone OnDemand 55 · myInterview 48

    0.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +19 beside that +19.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus myInterview.

CategoryWeightCornerstone OnDemandmyInterviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7238+34+6.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%5835+23+4.1
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%6042+18+2.7
Human Oversight Design12%5548+7+0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4533+12+1.4
Customer Documentation8%6040+20+1.6
Total100%56 (F)37 (F)+19+19.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCornerstone OnDemandmyInterview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
All criteria100%155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain76Sources on a separate domain

Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
myInterview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.