HomeCompareCovey vs TestDome

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs TestDome

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Covey leads TestDome by 10 points.

Covey sits 10 points above TestDome under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 37 — with Covey filed under Sourcing and TestDome under Assessment. Covey and TestDome each lead 2 of the 7 criteria, with 3 level, though the side of the split Covey holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Covey 72, TestDome 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 97% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Covey is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only TestDome is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCoveyTestDome
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSHR
Founded20182013

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · TestDome 15

    10.3 weighted points to Covey

  2. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Covey 25 · TestDome 28

    0.4 weighted points to TestDome

  3. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · TestDome 50

    0.3 weighted points to Covey

  4. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · TestDome 60

    0.2 weighted points to TestDome

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +10.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus TestDome.

CategoryWeightCoveyTestDomeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4040--
Bias Audit Transparency18%7215+57+10.3
FRIA Support15%2528-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5252--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3030--
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%47 (F)37 (F)+10+10.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyTestDome
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain31—
FRIA Support15%01—11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%01—50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%01—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain275Sources on the vendor's own domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
TestDome last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.