HomeCompareCovey vs Willo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Willo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Covey leads Willo by 6 points.

Covey scores 47 and Willo 41 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. Covey and Willo each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Covey holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Covey 72, Willo 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 91% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Covey is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Willo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCoveyWillo
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20182018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · Willo 30

    7.6 weighted points to Covey

  2. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Willo 62

    1.2 weighted points to Willo

  3. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · Willo 36

    0.7 weighted points to Willo

  4. 20% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · Willo 38

    0.4 weighted points to Covey

  5. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · Willo 54

    0.3 weighted points to Covey

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Willo 53

    0.1 weighted points to Willo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +6.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Willo.

CategoryWeightCoveyWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4038+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%7230+42+7.6
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5253-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5262-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3036-6-0.7
Customer Documentation8%5854+4+0.3
Total100%47 (F)41 (F)+6+6.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain11
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%0120Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 25 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.