§ The result
Criteria leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Criteria finishes 22 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 31 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Criteria leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Intervue.io leads none. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Criteria 68, Intervue.io 28, 20% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage Criteria builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Criteria
Criteria is a pre-employment assessment platform offering scientifically validated cognitive aptitude, personality, emotional-intelligence and skills tests, plus structured and AI-assisted interview tools, used to evaluate and rank job candidates.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Criteria is filed under Assessment AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Criteria | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2006 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Criteria 68 · Intervue.io 28
8.0 weighted points to Criteria
18% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Criteria 48 · Intervue.io 12
6.5 weighted points to Criteria
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Criteria 62 · Intervue.io 38
3.6 weighted points to Criteria
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Criteria 32 · Intervue.io 22
1.5 weighted points to Criteria
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Criteria 42 · Intervue.io 30
1.4 weighted points to Criteria
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Criteria 60 · Intervue.io 50
0.8 weighted points to Criteria
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Criteria 56 · Intervue.io 54
0.2 weighted points to Criteria
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +22.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Criteria minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Criteria | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 68 | 28 | +40 | +8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 48 | 12 | +36 | +6.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 22 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 38 | +24 | +3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 54 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 53 (F) | 31 (F) | +22 | +22.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Criteria | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Criteria has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Criteria, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Criteria last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next