Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Crosschq vs Interviewer.AI
Crosschq
Crosschq is a hiring-intelligence platform that combines automated 360 reference checks, an AI Interview Agent that conducts and scores voice/video screening interviews, AI resume matching and ranking, candidate-fraud and identity checks, Traitify personality and cognitive assessments, and quality-of-hire analytics.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Crosschq and Interviewer.AI tie at 47.
Crosschq (Screening) and Interviewer.AI (Video interview) tie at 47 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Crosschq leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Interviewer.AI 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, is both the widest raw gap (Crosschq 40, Interviewer.AI 32) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage Crosschq holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Crosschq4
- Interviewer.AI3
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring40 vs 32
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Crosschq is filed under Screening AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Crosschq | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight27% of the movement so far
Crosschq40Interviewer.AI321.0 weighted points to Crosschq
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight49% of the movement so far
Crosschq30Interviewer.AI350.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight64% of the movement so far
Crosschq38Interviewer.AI350.5 weighted points to Crosschq
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight75% of the movement so far
Crosschq50Interviewer.AI520.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight85% of the movement so far
Crosschq62Interviewer.AI580.3 weighted points to Crosschq
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight93% of the movement so far
Crosschq58Interviewer.AI600.3 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Crosschq62Interviewer.AI600.2 weighted points to Crosschq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Crosschq minus Interviewer.AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Crosschq | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 32 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 47F | - | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Crosschq | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Crosschq has 43 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Crosschq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 43 for Crosschq, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Crosschq last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.