The result

1 point separates Feenyx and DevSkiller.

Under rubric v1.0, Feenyx and DevSkiller finish 1 point apart, 40 to 39, as two Assessment entries. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to DevSkiller and Feenyx, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Feenyx holds, headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation, settle the total. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — DevSkiller 35, Feenyx 42 — and at a 20% weight it carries 61% of the weighted advantage Feenyx holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • DevSkiller3
  • Feenyx3
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Article 11 Technical Documentation35 vs 42
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

DevSkiller and Feenyx are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordDevSkillerFeenyx
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersPLUS
Founded20142016

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight45% of the movement so far

    DevSkiller35
    Feenyx42

    1.4 weighted points to Feenyx

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight63% of the movement so far

    DevSkiller22
    Feenyx25

    0.5 weighted points to Feenyx

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight75% of the movement so far

    DevSkiller55
    Feenyx58

    0.4 weighted points to Feenyx

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight84% of the movement so far

    DevSkiller52
    Feenyx50

    0.3 weighted points to DevSkiller

  5. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight92% of the movement so far

    DevSkiller40
    Feenyx38

    0.2 weighted points to DevSkiller

  6. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    DevSkiller58
    Feenyx55

    0.2 weighted points to DevSkiller

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.5.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is DevSkiller minus Feenyx, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightDevSkillerFeenyxΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3542-7-1.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2225-3-0.5
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%5855+3+0.2
Total100%39F40F-1-1.5

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDevSkillerFeenyx
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Audit reportSources on a separate domain80Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on a separate domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%20Sources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%114Audit reportSources on a separate domain305Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and Feenyx sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
DevSkiller last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Feenyx last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next