§ The result
DevSkiller leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
DevSkiller scores 39 and Intervue.io 31 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. DevSkiller is ahead of Intervue.io on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at DevSkiller 55 to Intervue.io 54. The advantage DevSkiller holds is spread out: Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (DevSkiller 52, Intervue.io 38, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 27% of the weighted points DevSkiller gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | IN |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · Intervue.io 38
2.1 weighted points to DevSkiller
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · Intervue.io 12
1.8 weighted points to DevSkiller
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · Intervue.io 28
1.4 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · Intervue.io 30
1.2 weighted points to DevSkiller
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · Intervue.io 50
0.6 weighted points to DevSkiller
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · Intervue.io 22
0.4 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · Intervue.io 54
0.1 weighted points to DevSkiller
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 12 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 31 (F) | +8 | +7.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next