§ The result
2 points separate DevSkiller and myInterview.
DevSkiller (Assessment) edges myInterview (Video interview) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 39 to 37. DevSkiller leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while myInterview leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, DevSkiller 22 to myInterview 35, 80% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, DevSkiller 58 to myInterview 40.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | AU |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · myInterview 35
2.3 weighted points to myInterview
15% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · myInterview 42
1.5 weighted points to DevSkiller
8% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · myInterview 40
1.4 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · myInterview 48
0.8 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · myInterview 33
0.8 weighted points to DevSkiller
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · myInterview 38
0.6 weighted points to myInterview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 42 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 37 (F) | +2 | +1.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next