Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
DevSkiller vs Workstream
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Workstream
Workstream is a mobile-first HR, payroll and hiring platform for hourly, multi-location employers such as QSR franchisees. Its hiring suite pairs a text-to-apply applicant tracking system with VoiceAI phone screens and VideoAI asynchronous video interviews, which return transcripts, AI summaries, pass/fail results for each question and match scores.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
DevSkiller and Workstream tie at 39.
DevSkiller, filed under Assessment, and Workstream, filed under Screening, tie at 39 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. DevSkiller leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Workstream 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. Workstream takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (DevSkiller 35, Workstream 40), which is 50% of the weighted advantage Workstream holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Human Oversight Design, DevSkiller 55 to Workstream 61.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- DevSkiller4
- Workstream3
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design55 vs 61
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, Workstream under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | DevSkiller | Workstream |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight26% of the movement so far
DevSkiller35Workstream401.0 weighted points to Workstream
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight45% of the movement so far
DevSkiller52Workstream470.8 weighted points to DevSkiller
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight63% of the movement so far
DevSkiller55Workstream610.7 weighted points to Workstream
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight79% of the movement so far
DevSkiller40Workstream350.6 weighted points to DevSkiller
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight88% of the movement so far
DevSkiller22Workstream200.4 weighted points to DevSkiller
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight96% of the movement so far
DevSkiller25Workstream270.3 weighted points to Workstream
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
DevSkiller58Workstream560.2 weighted points to DevSkiller
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus Workstream, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | Workstream | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 47 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 61 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 56 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 39F | 39F | - | -0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | Workstream | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workstream last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.