The result

1 point separates Fetcher and Dice.

Fetcher holds a 1-point edge over Dice under rubric v1.0, 37 to 36, with both scored in the Sourcing cohort. The 7 criteria split 3 to 2 in favour of Fetcher, with 2 level: Fetcher is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and Dice on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Dice 45, Fetcher 55 — and at a 15% weight it carries 61% of the weighted advantage Fetcher holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Dice2
  • Fetcher3
  • Level2
Widest raw gap
Data Governance Disclosure45 vs 55
Heaviest weighted swing
Data Governance Disclosure15% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Dice and Fetcher are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordDiceFetcher
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19902014

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight39% of the movement so far

    Dice45
    Fetcher55

    1.5 weighted points to Fetcher

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight66% of the movement so far

    Dice32
    Fetcher27

    1.0 weighted points to Dice

  3. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight80% of the movement so far

    Dice25
    Fetcher28

    0.5 weighted points to Fetcher

  4. Customer Documentation

    8% weight91% of the movement so far

    Dice50
    Fetcher55

    0.4 weighted points to Fetcher

  5. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight100% of the movement so far

    Dice55
    Fetcher52

    0.4 weighted points to Dice

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.1.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Dice minus Fetcher, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightDiceFetcherΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3227+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2528-3-0.5
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4555-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5552+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3535--
Customer Documentation8%5055-5-0.4
Total100%36F37F-1-1.1

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDiceFetcher
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—11—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%257Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain136Sources on the vendor's own domain

Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Fetcher has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 19 for Fetcher, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Dice last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Fetcher last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next