§ The result
Harver leads Dice by 20 points.
Harver finishes 20 points clear of Dice under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 36 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Harver leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Dice leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Dice 25, Harver 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Dice
Dice is a US job marketplace and resume database for tech roles, run by DHI Group, whose employer tools use a proprietary skills knowledge graph and machine learning (IntelliSearch) to match, score and rank sourced candidates and applicants against job postings.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
§ The record
Dice is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Harver under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Harver is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Dice | Harver |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 1990 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Dice 25 · Harver 80
9.9 weighted points to Harver
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Dice 32 · Harver 65
6.6 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Dice 25 · Harver 35
1.5 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Dice 45 · Harver 55
1.5 weighted points to Harver
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Dice 50 · Harver 60
0.8 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Dice 55 · Harver 50
0.6 weighted points to Dice
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Dice 35 · Harver 40
0.6 weighted points to Harver
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Dice minus Harver.
| Category | Weight | Dice | Harver | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 32 | 65 | -33 | -6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 80 | -55 | -9.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 56 (F) | -20 | -20.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Dice | Harver | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Dice last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next