§ The result
HireVue leads Draup by 16 points.
HireVue finishes 16 points clear of Draup under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 42 — across the Video interview and Sourcing cohorts. HireVue leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Draup leads 1, including Customer Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Draup 33, HireVue 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Draup
Draup is an AI-powered talent- and sales-intelligence platform that aggregates over a billion public professional profiles into skills, roles and labour-market analytics, and surfaces ranked candidate shortlists for enterprise workforce planning and recruiting.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
§ The record
Draup is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireVue is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Draup | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Draup 33 · HireVue 80
8.5 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Draup 48 · HireVue 65
3.4 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Draup 28 · HireVue 45
2.0 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Draup 25 · HireVue 35
1.5 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Draup 58 · HireVue 60
0.2 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Draup 57 · HireVue 55
0.2 weighted points to Draup
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Draup 54 · HireVue 55
0.1 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Draup minus HireVue.
| Category | Weight | Draup | HireVue | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 65 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 80 | -47 | -8.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 58 (F) | -16 | -15.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Draup | HireVue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Draup has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Draup and HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Draup, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Draup last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next