Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Draup vs Humanly
Draup
Draup is an AI-powered talent- and sales-intelligence platform that aggregates over a billion public professional profiles into skills, roles and labour-market analytics, and surfaces ranked candidate shortlists for enterprise workforce planning and recruiting.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Draup and Humanly tie at 42.
Draup, filed under Sourcing, and Humanly, filed under Screening, tie at 42 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Draup leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Humanly 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Draup 54, Humanly 40 — and at a 15% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage Draup holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Draup3
- Humanly3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure54 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Draup is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Humanly under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Humanly is in scope of
| Record | Draup | Humanly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight34% of the movement so far
Draup54Humanly402.1 weighted points to Draup
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight59% of the movement so far
Draup25Humanly351.5 weighted points to Humanly
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight80% of the movement so far
Draup33Humanly401.3 weighted points to Humanly
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight90% of the movement so far
Draup48Humanly450.6 weighted points to Draup
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
Draup57Humanly520.4 weighted points to Draup
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Draup28Humanly300.2 weighted points to Humanly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Draup minus Humanly, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Draup | Humanly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 40 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 52 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 42F | 42F | - | +0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Draup | Humanly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Draup has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Draup sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Draup, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Draup last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.